And 'these days, the controversy which opposed the Tar and Cei, the first determined that the teachers of religion can not compete with their teaching to the formation of the final grade, are not entitled to participate in polls. The CEI has obviously gone on all the rage.
I, since high school, I wonder: why religion can not be considered an issue as all the others? Because in most high school becomes an hour of "dolce far niente," which could be better used? Why can not I choose whether or not to follow the lessons of philosophy, but I can decide whether to participate or not to those of religion?

Someone will answer "for freedom of worship" but if it were taught in a way become an important cultural contribution to understanding one's religion and those of others. And who is an atheist would simply expand their knowledge, I do not see anything bad.
Philosophy is studied Sant'Agostino not necessarily have to share its thoughts to study it. Because the religion is not the same? Why should be a matter "tablet", which is right to exist just because the church was pleased that there is?
Making it a subject as important as all others do the voting religion contributes to the media and that teachers can participate in the ballots as Peer of material would be one (precious) hours earned.